Legal Opinion

Bosch Automotive Service Solutions, LLC v. Matal

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 22, 2017No. 2015-1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from the inter partes review (IPR) of U.S. Patent No. 6,904,796 (the ’796 patent) owned by Bosch Automotive Service Solutions LLC (Bosch). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) granted the IPR petition filed by Autel U.S. Inc. and Autel Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd. (Autel) and instituted the IPR on claims 1, 4-15, and 20-22 of the ’796 patent. Bosch filed a patent owner response and a “contingent”- motion to amend, seeking to substitute amended claims 23-38 for original claims 1, 4-15, and 20-22 in the event that the Board found the challenged…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Cirrus Design CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  2. American National v. Sleep Number CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  3. Dionex Softron Gmbh v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  4. Fleming v. Cirrus Design CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. Gamon Plus, Inc. v. Campbell Soup CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API