Belton v. Wateree Power Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
Mr. Chiee Justice Gary
(dissenting) : This is an action by the plaintiff to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him through the erection and closing of a dam across the waters of the Catawba or Wateree River, thereby creating a large pond of water and causing injury to the plaintiff’s lands, rendering them unfit for residential purposes, greatly depreciating and destroying the value thereof.
The complaint is as follows :
‘T. [This paragraph merely contains formal allegations, which are admitted.]
“2. That the plaintiff is, and was at the times hereinafter mentioned, seized and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Haig v. Wateree Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Woods v. Rock Hill Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Tompkins v. Augusta, &c., RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Free v. Parr Shoals Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.