Legal Opinion
Mount Vernon Housing Authority v. Jordan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 7, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Final judgment affirmed, without costs.
Although the petitioner may terminate a tenancy and not have to offer proof of the fact underlying the reason for the termination (New York City Housing Auth. v Paris, NYLJ, Jan. 8, 1971, p 19, col 7 [App Term, 2d Dept]; New York City Housing Auth. v Gantt, 57 Misc 2d 447 [and cases cited therein]), it must establish that it terminated on a ground authorized by statute or regulation under which the housing accommodations are administered and that procedural safeguards were properly followed (Escalera v New York City Housing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vinson v. Greenburgh Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Vinson v. Greenburgh Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- New York City Housing Authority v. GanttCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- New York City Housing Authority v. WilliamsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
- Abdil v. MartinezNew York Supreme Court · 2002