Randolph v. Meek
Tennessee Supreme Court
In Error.
1Opinion of the Court
The facts of this case are set out in the opinion of the court, as delivered by
judge Catron.
This was an action of covenant, brought by the de*59fendants in error vs. Randolph, upon a clause of general warranty, in a deed for 230 acres of land, by which dolph covenanted to warrant and forever defend the land and premises to the said A. and K. Meek, their heirs and assigns forever, &c. The deed bears date in November, 1818.
The Meeks in the court below, declared upon the clause of warranty, and assigned as a breach, that Randolph, on the 4th of July, 1818, had made a deed in fee simple to Parrish…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Marston v. HobbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- People v. RunkelNew York Supreme Court · 1812
- People v. LeonardNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Ilsley v. KnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1805