Legal Opinion
Dieter v. Trigen-Cinergy Solutions of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 6, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carpinello, J. Appeals from a decision and an amended decision of the Worker’s Compensation Board, filed June 30, 2003 and April 8, 2004, which ruled that claimant violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving a schedule loss of use award.
Claimant was receiving workers’ compensation benefits stemming from a work-related injury. In January 2002, in connection with his workers’ compensation claim, claimant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of falsifying a business record in the second degree, fined $1,000 and ordered to pay restitution in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Losurdo v. Asbestos Free, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Claim of Michaels v. Towne FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Bowes v. Gulinello's Town & CountryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Robbins v. JerusalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Lopresti v. Washington MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Harabedian v. New York Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Clarke v. Lomasney Combustion, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Losurdo v. Asbestos Free, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.