Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Bryant

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Langlade County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. The defendants 8. Bryant, B. W. Pierce, and O. H. Pierce appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The respondent commenced his action in the circuit court against 1VI. Miller and E. Neff, to recover *15for a bill of feed, flour, butter, etc., sold by him to said Miller & Neff, about the 30th of January, 1886. The price of the goods sold, including freight paid by respondent, was $646.72; and in said action the respondent claimed a lien for the value of the goods sold upon a lot of saw-logs owned by the appellants, Bryant, Pierce cfc Pierce, and so the appellants were made parties to the action.

The respondent claims that the goods were sold to Miller & Neff upon the statement of Neff that he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edleman v. KiddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Huse v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Brown v. La Crosse City Gas Light & Coke Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Jacubeck v. HewittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Challoner v. HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mark Paine Lumber Co. v. Douglas County Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kerrick v. RugglesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Garland v. HickeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API