Legal Opinion

Crittenden v. Dorn

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 1921No. 3423PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; William C. Van Pled, judge. Suit by Uorraine de la Montanya Crittenden and others against Narcissus Augustus Dorn and others. From a decree dismissing the suit, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The nature of this case is such that to an intelligent understanding of it a somewhat full statement of the facts and proceedings is essential. It grew out of a certain deed of trust, of date September 12, 1900, by James de la Montanya, of San Francisco, therein designated as trustor, by which he conveyed to D. S. Dorn, of the same city, in trust, certain specifically described real property, the first of which was a lot on Clay street in San Francisco, and being the property in contest between the parties to the present appeal; the second specifically described parcel,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. BabbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Hamilton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Croxall v. ShererdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heck v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Jones v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API