Legal Opinion

Wheelock v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 8, 1928No. Docket Nos. 12099, 13072Published

Held, that respondent did not err in including in the gross estate of decedent the value of certain real property transferred by him to his wife within two years prior to his death.

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF GEORGE A. WHEELOCK, JULIA E. WHEELOCK, EXECUTRIX, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Wheelock v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 12099, 13072.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

13 B.T.A. 828; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3176;

October 8, 1928, Promulgated

Held, that respondent did not err in including in the gross estate of decedent the value of certain real property transferred by him to his wife within two years prior to his death.

Raymond S. Norris, Esq., for the petitioner.

Frank T. Horner, Esq., for the respondent.

TRAMMELL

These proceedings, which were consolidated, are for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheelock v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API