Legal Opinion

Fronk v. Kam Yeung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this action as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3404. As the court properly determined, the record contains no clear indication that the case had ever been “marked ‘off or struck from the calendar or unanswered on a clerk’s calendar call” (CPLR 3404; see, Auerbach v Kaufman, 173 AD2d 229, 230; Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty of Town of Southampton v Heilner, 143 AD2d 134, 135). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Genesee County, Fahey, J. — Dismiss Action.) Present — Green, J. P.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. KaufmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty v. HeilnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API