Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Helsam Realty Co. v. H.J.A. Holding Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 16, 2004Published

1ConcurrenceGolia, J.

(concurring only in the outcome of the preceding memorandum but disagreeing with the findings of the majority). In view of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s decision in Bensonhurst Real Estate v Helsam Realty Co. (1 AD3d 302 [2003]), I am now reluctantly constrained to concur with the other members of this panel.

However, because Mr. Ishay, the principal owner of the respondent corporations is a person of dubious veracity who employs deception to willfully avoid paying his taxes and manipulates the law to subvert the law, I am likewise constrained to voice my dissent in the opinions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bensonhurst Real Estate, Ltd. v. Helsam Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Jervis Corp. v. Secretary of StateNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API