Legal Opinion

Browarek v. Pfalzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1991No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The negligence, if any, of defendant Raymond Pfalzer in causing his grandfather’s automobile to become stuck in the mud was not the proximate cause of the infant plaintiffs injury. Defendant could not have reasonably foreseen that, in attempting to extricate the car from the mud, the driver of a truck would leave the truck unattended, permitting it to roll down a slope and pin plaintiff against the car (see, Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950, mod, 46 NY2d 770; Scott v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Scott v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Di Ponzio v. RiordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Spence v. Lake Service Station, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Scarver v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Campbell v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API