Legal Opinion

Hearst Corporation v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 15, 1983No. [No. 56, September Term, 1982.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

297 Md. 112 (1983)

466 A.2d 486

THE HEARST CORPORATION

v.

WAYNE HUGHES

[No. 56, September Term, 1982.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided September 15, 1983.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ.

Theodore Sherbow and Mary R. Craig, with whom were Sherbow, Shea & Tatelbaum, P.A. on the brief, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · RodowskyRodowsky, J.

ELDRIDGE and DAVIDSON, JJ., dissent. DAVIDSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 132 infra, in which ELDRIDGE, J., joins.

The principal question presented in this appeal is whether, in a negligent…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited38 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Time, Inc. v. FirestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API