Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Dauphinais
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided November 7, 2016No. Case No. 3:15-cv-00218-TMBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Timothy M. Burgess, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs David Thompson, Aaron Downing, Jim Crawford, and District 18 of the Alaska Republican Party (“District 18”) bring this lawsuit against Defendants Paul Dauphinais, Mark Fish, Irene Catal-one, Ron King, Kenneth Kirk, and Vance Sanders (collectively, “Defendants” or “the State”) to challenge the constitutionality of four provisions of Alaska’s campaign finance laws under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.1 The Court called this matter for bench trial on April 25, 2016. The parties concluded their…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. HebdonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Donald Zimmerman v. City of Austin, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- David Thompson v. Heather HebdonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Alaska Public Offices Commission v. Donna Patrick, James K. Barnett, and John P. LambertAlaska Supreme Court · 2021