Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1893PublishedCited by 22 opinions

FROM RUTHERFORD. Appeal from Circuit Court of Rutherford County. RobeRt Cantbell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is an action of debt originating before a Magistrate, and afterwards tried, on appeal, in the Circuit CQurt by the presiding Judge without the intervention of .a jury.

The plaintiff, Mary E. Cowan, claimed that she purchased a sewing - machine from the defendant, the Singer Manufacturing Company, at the price of $55, payable in small installments, and upon agreement that the legal title should remain in the defendant until the full considération should be paid. She further claimed that, after she had paid $41.70 on the machine, the defendant regained possession of it, and appropriated it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sahlien v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Eller v. RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Glasgow v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Toomey v. AtyoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pamperin v. Streamline Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Murray v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Beatty v. SchenckTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API