Mickenheim v. Cathcart
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
The first problem which we are called upon to solve is whether this Court has jurisdiction ratione materiae of the matter which is involved, in this appeal. A *576dear understanding of the facts is essential to a determination of this question.
Plaintiff and the defendant were married in the Parish of S.t. Bernard on January 27, 1947, and established a matrimonial domicile in the Parish of Orleans. One child was born of that union. On December 19, 1952, the plaintiff, in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Or-, leans, filed suit for separation from bed and board. She also…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Petit & Boh Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Hamilton v. DabbsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Succession of AndersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mickenheim v. CathcartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Mickenheim v. CathcartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955