Legal Opinion

De Rose v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 16, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the grounds of appeal as presented on this appeal were involved in a rule for new trial allowed in the Supreme Court and disposed of there. 9 N. J. Mis. R. 183.

The grounds of appeal are that the trial court refused to direct a nonsuit for the reasons (1) that the accident, if it occurred by the deceased coming in contact with train No. 66, was caused by the sole negligence of plaintiff’s decedent and therefore his negligence was the proximate cause of the accident; (2) that no negligence had been shown on the part of the railroad; (3) that plaintiff’s decedent…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of Santa PerroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Holden v. RolffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Reynolds v. HermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API