Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Foxworth v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided December 13, 2011No. 2010-KA-00243-COAPublished

1Concurrence

MAXWELL, J.,

specially concurring:

¶ 17. I agree with the result reached by the majority but write separately to address the propriety of the State’s preemptive use of an accomplice’s guilty plea to blunt a defendant’s attack on an accomplice’s credibility. I find this practice serves a proper evidentiary purpose and is permissible if a limiting instruction is given and the accomplice testifies at trial.

I. A Co-defendant’s Guilty Plea Is Admissible for Other Purposes

¶ 18. The Mississippi Supreme Court has recognized that “[fjederal and state appellate courts have found the admission of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Lawrence Charles KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Frederick Cody Magee, John Olin Buchanan, George Walter Hanson, Jr., and Robert Frank NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Bobby Ray DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Thomas WiesleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API