Legal Opinion

Wright v. Salzberger & Son

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1923No. Civ. No. 4452, Civ. No. 4453PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

The record in this matter presents two consolidated appeals. Two actions were brought against defendants, one by Thomas Osborne Wright, a minor, suing by his guardian ad litem, and the other by Joseph S. Wright, the father of said minor, for medical and hospital expenses 'incurred by him in treating the injuries sustained by his minor son. After a trial before a jury, a verdict in each case was rendered in favor of defendants. A motion for a "new trial was made, thereafter, by the plaintiff in each case. These motions were granted and orders granting new trials were made as follows: “It is by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Domico v. CasassaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. De Vall v. PerrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Walker v. Beaumont Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. Salzberger & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Milton v. Los Angeles Motor Coach Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Sagor v. Joseph Burnett Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Brininstool v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API