Legal Opinion

Winebrenner v. Dorten

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. 90-SC-842-DGPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAIN, Justice..

June Rose Winebrenner (now Tyndall) appeals from a decision of the Court of Appeals holding that the will of her former husband, William A. Hazelip, was revoked by implication of law, thus voiding its bequest to her. We affirm.

Movant Winebrenner and the testator were married, each for the second time, on August 28,1980. Some three months later, on December 4, 1981, they each executed a mutual will. Mr. Hazelip’s will bequeathed certain insurance benefits comprising approximately forty percent of his estate to his four children by his first marriage, the individual respondents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. George v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Welsh v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  3. Morse v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Brown v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994
  3. Omni Insurance Co. v. CoatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  4. Estate of Duvall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  5. Fryxell v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API