Freud v. Ruhl
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Rohnert, J. Bill by Leopold Freud against Louise Ruhl and others to foreclose a mortgage. There was a decree for complainant, and a sale under the decree, at which complainant and John B. Sevald became the purchasers of separate moieties of the land. Defendant Ruhl appeals from an order denying her petition to redeem.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Ruhl and wife, Louise, owned undivided moieties of a certain tract of land. On January 18, 1895, Clark and wife levied upon the undivided half owned by Mr. Ruhl an execution against the property of the latter. A month or so later the Ruhls joined in a mortgage for #1,000 to Freud. Sale on the execution occurred June 5, 1898, and Clark purchased Mr. Ruhl’s undivided half for #4,000. Freud foreclosed his mortgage, and obtained a decree on May 19, 1899. On September 1, 1899, he attempted to redeem the land sold on execution, as a judgment creditor, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1897, § 9185),…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Emmet v. BradstreetNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Van Horne v. McLarenNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Rice v. PuettIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by1 opinion
- Campau v. Detroit Driving ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1904