Legal Opinion

Calkins v. Ann Arbor Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Dodds, J., presiding. Case by Elijah Calkins against the Ann Arbor Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant because of injuries received by him when alighting from a train. Defendant has appealed from this judgment. The version of the plaintiff is, in substance, as follows :

“I was a passenger on defendant’s train, having a ticket from Ithaca to Owosso Junction. After the train *313left Garland, the brakeman said the next stop would be Owosso Junction. I was not familiar with the depot grounds or premises surrounding Owosso Junction. It was quite dark as the train reached Owosso. The train stopped. Just as it stopped, the brakeman came into the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BoucheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Holton v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  3. People v. BoucheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. MatthewsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. MatthewsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API