Legal Opinion

Lane v. O'Toole

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Pembina Count; Sauter, J. Action by David Lane against Thomas O’Toole. Verdict for plaintiff. From an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.

This action was tried to a jury, and a verdict was. directed in favor of the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial, based upon a statement of the case, was denied, and from the order denying the motion defendant appealed to this Court. No exception was taken to the instructions of the Court to the jury, nor did defendant except to the refusal of the Court to direct a verdict in defendant’s favor, as the Court was requested to do at the close of the case. Nor can there be any review of the evidence in this case to determine whether the verdict is sustained by the evidence. After a careful…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vallancey v. HuntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Omlie v. Farmers' State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API