Foss v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
This action was brought to recover for destruction of plaintiff’s buildings and fixtures and for loss of future profits, by fire alleged to have resulted from defendant’s negligent delay in supplying telephone connection to a fire department. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal rendered upon plaintiff’s refusal to plead further after a demurrer had been sustained to his complaint.
There is no claim that the fire was started or caused by respondent’s neglect. Respondent’s liability is based on appellant’s claim that a delay in respondent’s telephone service delayed arrival of fire…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GlawsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Robinson v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Abresch v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Hardy v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Debra Jo Edwards v. Honeywell, Incorporated, and Honeywell Protection ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.