Legal Opinion
City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of Waukesha
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 17, 2001No. 99-1680PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
In Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U. S. 51 (1965), a case involving a state motion-picture censorship scheme, the Court announced procedural requirements necessary to guard against unconstitutional prior restraint of expression. Those requirements included assurance of “a prompt final judicial decision, to minimize the deterrent effect of an interim and possibly erroneous denial of a license.” Id., at 59. Twenty-five years later, in FW/PBS, Inc. v. Dallas, 493 U. S. 215 (1990), the Court applied some of the Freedman standards to a municipal ordinance conditioning the operation of sexually oriented…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Mhany Management, Inc. v. County of NassauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.