Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 10, 2015No. Case No. 09-CV-2764 (PJS/TNL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge

In 2001, Barclays Bank, PLC — a British financial-services company — started marketing to American banks a product called “Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities” or “STARS.” Barclays proposed to American banks that they partner with Barclays in a series of complicated transactions designed to exploit differences between the tax laws of the United States and the tax laws of the United Kingdom. The plan had four key elements: (1) the American bank would voluntarily subject some of its income-producing assets to U.K. taxation; (2)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Biddle v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. Wells Fargo & Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API