Cadle Co. v. Jay
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceShepherd, J.
I agree with the court’s conclusion that the New York judgment is enforceable in Florida. I submit, however, that despite language used by the parties in their briefs and during oral argument to suggest that this is a case about personal jurisdiction, the real issue raised is sufficiency of service of process. As the court’s opinion notes, the New York court conducted numerous proceedings on this issue, which fully comported with New York law, see section 308(5) New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (McKinney 1991), and expressly found that the Jays were properly served. Neither the Full…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Haas v. HaasSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Whipple v. JSZ Financial Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- CREDIT COUNSELING FOUNDATION, INC. v. HylkemaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Hesser v. FlickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999