Legal Opinion
Copp v. Clagg
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 1990No. Case 13-88-16PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
Defendants-appellants Jack and Margaret Clagg appeal from the trial court's order granting prejudgment interest to plaintiffs-appellees, Charles and Shirley Copp. We affirm.
Appellants' dog ran out in front of appellees' motorcycle, the resulting collision caused injuries to appellee Charles Copp's ankle. Appelees' counsel sent Allstate, appellants' insurer, an offer to settle for $140,000. Allstate countered with an offer of $18,000. Appellees filed suit on October 5, 1984.
Appellees served interrogatories on appellants. Appellants objected to certain ones. Appellees obtained an order…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Kalain v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Cox v. Fisher Fazio Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sindel v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Szitas v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ankney v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1992