Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Acom

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1897No. 9314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Montgomery District Court. Hon. J. D. McCue, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

This action was brought to compel a reconveyance of a tract of land in Montgomery County, consisting of 160 acres, and for an accounting of the rents and profits of the same.

On April 26, 1875, Enos McLaughlin and his wife borrowed twelve hundred dollars from Thomas Acom, and to secure the payment of the same executed a deed to the land, which upon its face purported to convey to Acom the absolute title. At the same time Acom executed an instrument of defeasance, in the form of a bond, which recited that the deed, although absolute in form, was in fact a mortgage given and accepted as security…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waterson v. DevoeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. R. L. McDonald & Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Uhl v. SmallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Miller v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wiswell v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Eaton v. McCartyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Baldwin v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Columbia Trust Co. v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Cones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API