Legal Opinion

Hample v. McKinney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1929No. 5393PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

— This cause has been before this court upon a former occasion, the judgment being reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. (Hample v. McKinney, 44 Ida. 435, 258 Pac. 179.)

It is alleged in the complaint that respondent is indebted to Jeremiah Williams & Co., a copartnership, in the sum of $2,508.22, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum, on account of money loaned to respondent by said company; that the company assigned said indebtedness by an instrument in writing, duly executed, to appellant; that respondent has not paid the same or any .part thereof and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DouglassIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hample v. McKinneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thornton v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Milwaukee Land Co. v. BogleIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API