Legal Opinion
Mack v. Earle M. Jorgensen Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 20, 1970No. 68-C-354PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiff has moved that the court order a new trial under Rules 59 and 60 (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Alternatively, the plaintiff asks that he be allowed to present additional testimony in this case. In my opinion, both of the said motions must be denied.
At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, the defendant moved to dismiss the action. The latter motion was argued extensively in the absence of the jury, and the court concluded that the motion should be granted. An oral opinion was put into the record by the court, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bunbury v. KraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Gordon E. Magnuson v. Fairmont Foods Company, Inc., and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Defendants-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- William F. Mack v. Earle M. Jorgensen Co., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972