Legal Opinion
In re Trevor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 11, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, J.:
Testator devised his residuary estate to his executors to have and to hold the same in trust for the uses and purposes following: The executors are directed to set apart and invest one-third of his personal estate for the benefit of his widow during her lfe, and upon her death the corpus to be disposed of for the benefit of her children, “ by adding the same in equal parts to the several shares ” representing her children in the residuary estate. After various other provisions, with which we are not concerned upon this appeal, the executors are directed to divide the residuary estate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Purdy v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In Re the Accounting of SilsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In Re the Accounting of WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Benedict v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Corse v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of IttlesonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re ButtnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
- In re the Accounting of City National BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re TrevorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re the Accounting of Exchange National Bank of OleanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959