Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Klein

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1911PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from McLennan County Court; Tom L. McCulloch, Judge. Action by E. S. Klein against J. H. Eaton. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This suit was brought by ap-pellee against appellant to recover certain commissions alleged to be due by him to the firm of Klein & Witt, one-half of which amount, it is claimed, was transferred and assigned by Witt to Klein, and payment thereof guaranteed. The case was tried before the court without a jury, who rendered judgment for appellee against appellant for the full amount claimed, and judgment against Witt for one-half thereof, provided, however, that, if the judgment against the appellant should be satisfied in full, the judgment against Witt should likewise be regarded as satisfied.

[…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wandry v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. W. M. Cason & Bro. v. ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Callaghan v. Estate of GrenetTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. City of Fort Worth v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guadalupe County v. PothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. McConnell v. LibecapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Irwin v. State Nat. Bank of Ft. WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Womack v. CarsonTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Security Union Ins. Co. v. GullettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API