Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

McClain v. McClain

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 30, 1953No. 5-195Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEd. F. McFaddin, Justice

I concur in so much of the opinion of this court as fixes the property rights; but I dissent from so much of the opinion of this Court as awards Mrs. McClain an absolute divorce. I am of the opinion that Mrs. McClain should have only a limited divorce, rather than an absolute divorce.

Because limited divorces have almost “passed out of style” in our reported cases in the last thirty years, I think it well that Judges and others interested in marital relations should again give serious consideration to the granting of limited divorces: certainly such limited divorces would prevent remarriage of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  2. Kientz v. KientzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  5. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API