McClain v. McClain
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEd. F. McFaddin, Justice
I concur in so much of the opinion of this court as fixes the property rights; but I dissent from so much of the opinion of this Court as awards Mrs. McClain an absolute divorce. I am of the opinion that Mrs. McClain should have only a limited divorce, rather than an absolute divorce.
Because limited divorces have almost “passed out of style” in our reported cases in the last thirty years, I think it well that Judges and others interested in marital relations should again give serious consideration to the granting of limited divorces: certainly such limited divorces would prevent remarriage of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Kientz v. KientzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Shirey v. ShireySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.