Allegheny County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentChief Justice Castille
I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the Commonwealth Court’s holding that deputy sheriffs of second class counties are not “policemen” for purposes of collective bargaining under Act 111 of 1968, 43 P.S. §§ 217.1-217.10 (“Act 111”), but are instead employees covered by the Pennsylvania Public Employe Relations Act (the “PERA”).1
As the majority concedes, our review of this appeal arising out of a decision by the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (the “PLRB”) is limited to determining whether there has been a violation of constitutional rights, an error of law, a procedural irregularity, or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. LeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Kopko v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- DeFazio v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Venneri v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.