Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allegheny County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2012No. 29 WAP 2010Published

1DissentChief Justice Castille

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the Commonwealth Court’s holding that deputy sheriffs of second class counties are not “policemen” for purposes of collective bargaining under Act 111 of 1968, 43 P.S. §§ 217.1-217.10 (“Act 111”), but are instead employees covered by the Pennsylvania Public Employe Relations Act (the “PERA”).1

As the majority concedes, our review of this appeal arising out of a decision by the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (the “PLRB”) is limited to determining whether there has been a violation of constitutional rights, an error of law, a procedural irregularity, or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Borough of Ellwood City v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. LeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Kopko v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. DeFazio v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Venneri v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API