Legal Opinion
Di Benedetto v. Morgenthau
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 5, 1945No. 8709PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
Appellants are customs inspectors at the port of New York. In compliance with an order of the Treasury Department to perform “regular hours of duty,” Di Benedetto worked on New Year’s Day, Thursday, January 1, 1942, and Dorrance worked on Decoration Day, Saturday, May 30, 1942, Armistice Day, November 11, 1942, and Thanksgiving Day, November 26, 1942. Appellants signed the customary statements of services rendered and filled out and signed pay vouchers indicating the nature of the work done and calling for extra compensation, calculated on the basis of twice their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. MemoloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Rolls-Royce Limited, Derby, England, a British Company v. The United States and United Aircraft Corporation, Defendant-IntervenorUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Almour v. Pace, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Kristensen v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.