Legal Opinion

Peacock Construction Co. v. West

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1965No. 41190PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The petition affirmatively alleges and admits payment of a portion of the contract price, and seeks to recover the balance allegedly due for completion of West’s performance. We thus construe the petition as, suing for the final payment due under the agreement.

The construction contract for breach of which plaintiff seeks to recover is attached as an exhibit to the petition. It sets out an agreement that plaintiff would perform certain work “in strict accordance with” plans prepared by a firm denominated as “Architect.” Other provisions- of the contract especially…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hull v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Sellers v. City of SummervilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Jenkins v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Grahn Construction Co. v. PridgenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sasser & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Atlantic States Construction Co. v. Drummond & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Central Nat. Ins. Co. of Omaha v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Stribling v. AilionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Riley Construction Co. v. Schillmoeller & Krofl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API