Legal Opinion

Rios v. Mazur-Hart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1993No. 92C-10107; CA A76700PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that defendant violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, sections 13 and 16, of the Oregon Constitution. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss. ORS 34.680. We affirm.

Plaintiff, a patient in the Oregon State Hospital maximum security ward, filed a habeas corpus petition. The court issued a writ. Defendant filed a return and plaintiff filed a replication that stated his allegations in detail. Pursuant to ORS 34.680(1), defendant filed a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shelton v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Kennedy v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API