Legal Opinion
Stephanie v. Consumers Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1955No. 36,628PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action for damages to plaintiff’s house trailer under the “extended coverage” provisions of a policy of fire and extended coverage insurance issued by defendant Consumers Mutual Insurance Company in effect at the time of loss. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $575. The provision of the policy directly involved reads as follows:
“This Company shall not be liable for loss to the interior of the building or the property covered therein caused, (a) by rain, snow, sand or dust, whether driven by wind or not, unless the building covered or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Maas v. Midway Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Wolfangel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Opten v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greenlee v. DreesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966