Legal Opinion

Stephanie v. Consumers Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1955No. 36,628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action for damages to plaintiff’s house trailer under the “extended coverage” provisions of a policy of fire and extended coverage insurance issued by defendant Consumers Mutual Insurance Company in effect at the time of loss. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $575. The provision of the policy directly involved reads as follows:

“This Company shall not be liable for loss to the interior of the building or the property covered therein caused, (a) by rain, snow, sand or dust, whether driven by wind or not, unless the building covered or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Maas v. Midway Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Wolfangel v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Opten v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenlee v. DreesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API