Legal Opinion

Lane v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 22, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Indictment for larceny of cotton. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. May 13, 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

The accused was placed upon trial upon an indictment charging him with the offense of simple larceny, and was convicted. His motion for a new trial having been overruled, he excepted. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence which is contained in the -record, it does not appear that there was any evidence showing the value of the article alleged to have been stolen, or that it was of any value. Eor this reason the conviction was unauthorized, and the judge should have granted a new trial. Hawkins v. State, 95 Ga. 458; Smith v. State, Id. 460; May v. State, 111 Ga. 840. It does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hackney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Beall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. May v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Bryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Portwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API