Legal Opinion

Miot v. JoCarl Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion by defendant JoCarl Realty Corp. for reargument granted. On reargument the decision of this -court dated November 4, 1963 (19 A D 2d 889) is amended to read as follows: “In an action to recover damages for personal injury, both defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County, dated April 3, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion to vacate the prior orders dismissing the complaint against the defendants for lack of prosecution, on condition that plaintiff pay to each defendant $25 for its expenses. Order of April 3, 1962 reversed, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re GlasserNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Schoenberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Berger v. BergerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Samuels v. SamuelsNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. GutenplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Plaza 400 Owners Corp. v. ResnicoffCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API