Legal Opinion

Kay v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Frank P. Miller, vendee in a land contract, was obligated to pay installments of a paving tax. He assigned the contract to Joseph H. Schulte by a writing under which Schulte assumed the obligation to pay the tax. That writing follows:

“In consideration of $1.00 to me in hand paid by Joseph H. Schulte hereby grant, sell and convey to him all my right, claim and interest in and to the within contract, and in and to the premises described, with the benefits to be derived therefrom and said assignee in consideration of the premises, hereby assumes and agrees to perform and carry out all parts of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EngardMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kendzierski v. KendzierskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API