Canton v. Grinnell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Trespass vi et armis by Mary A. Canton against Ira L. Grinnell and Clayton A. Grinnell, copartners as Grinnell Bros. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for an assault committed upon her by the defendants’ servants while removing from the home occupied by herself and husband a piano which had been sold to plaintiff’s husband on a contract retaining title in Grinnell Bros., and authorizing them to retake the piano whenever there was default in payment. The declaration averred that the piano was plaintiff’s property, but no recovery for the value of the piano was sought. The court charged the jury that the piano must by them be considered as belonging to plaintiff’s husband, unless they had…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Fitzsimmons v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shinabarger v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Ducre v. Sparrow-Kroll Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Stewart v. NapucheMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Zart v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Moffit v. White Sewing Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.