Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Harty

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1933No. 29,350PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILTON, Justice.

W. E. Galloway, who was on June 6, 1917, appointed guardian of the estate and person of Michael Harty, incompetent, appealed from a judgment disallowing claimed compensation for services.

Following a petition filed with the probate court for his removal as such guardian, that court issued a citation requiring Galloway to file his final account as guardian and to show cause why he should not be removed as such. After a hearing thereon the probate court found that Galloway had mismanaged the estate and in several instances had misapplied funds thereof amounting to $7,847.79, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of MarchildonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PalmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Eriksson v. PalmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Galloway v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API