Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Horkulic v. Galloway

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2008No. 33352, 33353Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, J.

(Filed Feb. 21, 2008)

I agree fully with all portions of the majority’s decision in this case. I choose to write separately merely to point out that, in granting as moulded the petition for writ of prohibition on the issue of attorney fees filed by TIG Insurance Company (hereinafter *466“TIG”), this Court has made no determination with respect to the reasonableness of those fees. Insofar as TIG was denied the opportunity to participate in the hearing wherein it was required to pay the attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the Horkul-ics’ efforts to compel enforcement of the compromise…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Claypool v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
  4. Daily Gazette Co., Inc. v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kanawha Valley Radiologists, Inc. v. One Valley Bank, N.A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API