Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holmberg v. Holmberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1952No. 35,507Published

1DissentMagney, Justice

Conclusion of law No. IV reads:

“That the defendant will pay to the plaintiff on the entry of the decree herein the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), but plaintiff is not entitled to any other right, title, interest or distribution in or of defendant’s property of any kind or nature.”

And No. VI reads:

“That except as herein set forth, neither party shall have any right, title or interest against the other party or against the estate of the other party.” (Italics supplied.)

Paragraph VI does not follow the wording of the stipulation. It seems to me that what defendant is doing here is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Hoff v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Martinson v. MartinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Simons v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API