Legal Opinion

Adair v. Clay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1989No. 66296Published

1Opinion of the Court

780 P.2d 650 (1988)

Tony Lee ADAIR, et al., Appellants,

v.

Cheryl CLAY, in her capacity as Assessor, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, et al., Appellees.

No. 66296.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 5, 1988.

Supplement to Opinion June 27, 1989.

As Corrected June 29, 1989.

Rehearings Denied September 20, 1989.

Sneed, Lang, Adams, Hamilton, Downie & Barnett by R. Hayden Downie, Brian S. Gaskill and G. Steven Stidham, Tulsa, for appellants.

Doris L. Fransein, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tulsa, for appellee Board of County Com'rs for Tulsa County.

HODGES, Justice.

This case presents two issues arising out of the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Hunter v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API