Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Nadal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 2001No. 4D00-2705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Bradley Jacobs appeals an order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction.

It is well-settled that a two-part inquiry is required to assess whether the exercise of long-arm jurisdiction is appropriate. “First, it must be determined that the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to bring the action within the ambit of the statute; and if it does, the next inquiry is whether sufficient ‘minimum contacts’ are demonstrated to satisfy due process requirements.” Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla.1989); see also Woods v. Nova Companies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Woods v. Nova Companies Belize Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Washington Capital Corp. v. MILANDCODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. QSR, INC. v. Concord Food Festival Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Norwest Bank v. American Centennial Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GirodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Mulligan v. Frank Foundation Child Assistance InternationalDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
  3. Mulligan v. FRANK FOUNDATION CHILD ASSISTANCEDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API