Jacobs v. Nadal
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Bradley Jacobs appeals an order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of in personam jurisdiction.
It is well-settled that a two-part inquiry is required to assess whether the exercise of long-arm jurisdiction is appropriate. “First, it must be determined that the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to bring the action within the ambit of the statute; and if it does, the next inquiry is whether sufficient ‘minimum contacts’ are demonstrated to satisfy due process requirements.” Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla.1989); see also Woods v. Nova Companies…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Venetian Salami Co. v. ParthenaisSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Woods v. Nova Companies Belize Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Washington Capital Corp. v. MILANDCODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- QSR, INC. v. Concord Food Festival Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Norwest Bank v. American Centennial Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GirodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Mulligan v. Frank Foundation Child Assistance InternationalDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
- Mulligan v. FRANK FOUNDATION CHILD ASSISTANCEDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008