Legal Opinion

ARMANDO CABALLERO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 2020No. 20-1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ARMANDO CABALLERO, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. No. 4D20-1954 [December 2, 2020] Petition for writ of habeas corpus to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-009967CF10A. Armando Caballero, Chipley, pro se. No appearance for respondent. PER CURIAM. Aramando Caballero petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging he is illegally incarcerated based on faulty DNA evidence. This is not the proper use of the great writ of habeas…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Caballero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API