Blankenship v. Gardner
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MICHIE, District Judge.
These cases present questions as to the meaning and effect of 42 U.S.C.A. § 406(b) (Supp.1965).
On July 30, 1965 Congress amended the Social Security Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and in particular section 206 (42 U.S.C. § 406). (hereinafter referred to as the amendment) to provide for the establishment of attorney fees for representation before the federal courts pursuant to a proceeding for review instituted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1964 ed.).
In all three cases involved here the social security claimant prevailed in this court and final judgments…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Grady L. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Eva G. McDonald Next Friend and Guardian Ad Litem of Annie Ruth McDonald a ChildCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Glendal B. Webb v. Elliot L. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Rodriguez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Britton v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
- Wilson v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.