Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Gardner

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided July 8, 1966No. Civ. A. 1086, 64-C-99-A, 65-C-45-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHIE, District Judge.

These cases present questions as to the meaning and effect of 42 U.S.C.A. § 406(b) (Supp.1965).

On July 30, 1965 Congress amended the Social Security Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and in particular section 206 (42 U.S.C. § 406). (hereinafter referred to as the amendment) to provide for the establishment of attorney fees for representation before the federal courts pursuant to a proceeding for review instituted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1964 ed.).

In all three cases involved here the social security claimant prevailed in this court and final judgments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Grady L. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare v. Eva G. McDonald Next Friend and Guardian Ad Litem of Annie Ruth McDonald a ChildCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Glendal B. Webb v. Elliot L. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  3. Rodriguez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Britton v. GardnerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
  5. Wilson v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API