Andrews v. Crenshaw
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
ON Petition to Re-heaR.
2Opinion of the Court · NelsonNelson, J.
Por the third time, during the present term, this. large record is before us, on a respectful and ingenious petition for re-hearing; which, although drawn with much skill and ability, really presents nothing new. We have- re-examined it the third time, and are satisfied that it was correctly decided, and therefore refuse to grant the petition.
*152During tbe present term, we Lave disposed of more tban seven hundred causes; and, of that number, petitions for re-hearing have been filed in a very few cases, not one of which has been granted. "We may remark, not in reference to…
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gulf, M. O.R. Co. v. UnderwoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Estep v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Johnson v. BrowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Nashville v. State Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Nashville v. State Board of EqualizationTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.